Alice Bag’s reading and discussion/interview with Medusa and Alice Bag

Mako Fitts and Maylei Blackwell just introduced each other in totally fun ways—two scholarly activistas!

Alice Bag is reading from Violence Girl, remembering her Chicana childhood in East LA—going to Mexican movies downtown on Broadway with her family. She’s remembering the vending machines in the movie theater bathroom and discovering Kotex, which she wore on her head—“the mystery of the little white bonnet”…!

She’s now singing with The Januariez, a local band—a punkchera, a ranchera song transformed! OMG, how wonderful… I could listen to this all night.

She’s now telling a story, remembering her high school fascination with Elton John. She sings “Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting” and the audience screams when she finally did the punk jump—Medusa’s in the front row, singing along. Actually, everyone’s singing along—SATURDAY! SATURDAY! SATURDAY! Medusa unexpectedly sang the last verse as a solo and everyone REALLY went nuts.

Alice somehow managed to go back into storytelling after that, saying that she created The Bags after that, and performed anger. Her writing about the experience of performing is extraordinary—absolutely immediate. She and Medusa sing “Babylonian Gorgon” and every iPhone in the place is pointed at them. There’s a beautiful generosity between them: they’re both so confident that they’re beyond any need to dominate and they share the stage easily.

The set is over and we shift to the interviews. Mako Fitts introduces Medusa as the queen of the lesbo-MCs, and I listen to Mako with increasing respect and admiration: she sure knows how to do a hip-hop intro. She’s utterly inside the language and the metaphors. Alice comes back on stage and sits. MayLei asks what inspired them both, and Medusa cites her aunt, a singer-songwriter, and her childhood contact with extraordinary musicians as a result. Alice Bag remembers a music teacher at school, who gave her the opportunity to sing for educational cartoon soundtracks in Spanish.

Mako asks where their willingness to innovate comes from and Alice says “it’s like plucking it from the air, lettig it come in.” Maylei asks, “You’ve both been characterized as angry—how do you channel your femininity?” Medusa describes pushing her voice “to where it can’t be pushed anymore.” She says, “Inside of me there is this man, this woman, this child, this stripper, this goddess… Your femininity is your strength.” Alice Bag says she often feels androgynous on stage, defined not by gender but by strength.

Mako cites continuing problems around women’s access to space and asks whether they think anything’s changed during their lifetimes. Alice says that there are now far more woman musicians and that it gives her great pleasure to see women claiming their space. Medusa says that “women in hip hop have to take what they want, and have to have the hunger of a lion to make it.” She notes that b-girls “hone their craft in a different way,” becoming more masculine as they get more skilled.

MayLei notes they’re both from LA and asks how that shaped them. Alice Bag remembers lots of new arrivals in Hollywood during the 1970s, a terriifc mix of ethnicities and sounds, and says she thinks “the city comes through in a very organic way.” She describes her writing as a way to evoke that experience and the experience of singing on stage. Medusa grew up in Buena Park, one of 5 Black kids in a primarily Chican@ school, and she remembers it with warmth and affection, saying all of that is in her, and that music enables people to immerse themselves in other sensibilities in deep and meaningful ways.

Mako asks for their most outrageous, crazy memory of performing! At this point, these two women have the audience in their hands. Medusa says she has too many such memories, and then relates how her baggy pants fell around her ankles during a performance and how she didn’t notice until she tried to dance sideways. But then she remembers a time when she freestyled about how lesbians can & should “find a king” so they could have children, and how some of her lesbian fans were incensed.

An audience member asks what young bands they’re into and Medusa says she’s always on the lookout, always curious about new performers. Alice says she follows young women’s bands. An audience member just asked what they sing in the shower! Medusa says she has a mental jukebox, a mental rolodex, that opens up in the shower. MayLei asks what their dream collaboration would be. Medusa says Marvin Gaye… “and I would give him some too!” Alice said Bessie Smith, “and I would give her some too.”

What a panel. This was a high point in a marvelous day!

Barni Qaasim’s workshop on online video for social justice

I’m already pyched to be here since I loved the clips of Barni’s films last night—especially her extraordinary footage of Somali women singing for a new baby.

So far there are only 7 people here but everyone is here for real, focused reasons–everyone works on social justice, or film, or both. Barni started out by saying that she thinks artists tell stories that can make a real difference.

Hah–fellow blogger Tiffany Ana Lopez just came in, laptop at the ready. Let’s see how our accounts create a dialogue!

We’re gathering around her laptop to see a YouTube video about immigration in AZ. It’s amazing—full of veyr immediate stories and testimonio. She asks what a video about social justice can or should look like. An older White man in the circle (a self-described anarchist) says he likes the way it isn’t snide in the ways that mainstream news is. Several others said they like its realness—letting the material tell the story. This strikes me as idealistic—as an ethnographer, I know that ‘the material’ can tell a range of possible stories, depending on who’s shaping it! The filmmaker Scott said, as he did last night at the film festival, that he like “authenticity,” making me wonder who gets to determine what’s authentic and what isn’t.

Barni notes tht its essential to make such grassroots films with the involvement of community members. She says that maintaining a sense of the conversational can make a big difference. This particular film was emailed far and wide in an email blast by the Tucson community members affected by HB 1070, resulting in a very effective fundraising drive. She says she goes, hangs out, helps out, and shoots in between all the other activities.

She ecourages simple filmmaking—a Flip cam, a cell phone. She says you can create very moving media with simple means, including simple editing directly on YouTube. I’m more and more inspired by all this—I want to run right out and interview women at this unconference!

So…

… why are you reading this? Who are you? Were you here? What did you see or hear, who did you meet, what did you learn?

Panel, “Revenge or Recovery?,” on Black oral histories and archives

I’m already impressed by Mashadi Matabane and Laina Dawes, the two presenters. They’ve attested to the exscription of Black performers from the history of rock and metal, and how often people think Jimi Hendrix was an anomaly.

They’re sharing some of their interviews with Black woman performers (video and audio). One interviewee describes how she walks into a room with an electric guitar, and people don’t believe she can play it… or think it should be an acoustic guitar! Mashadie has great historical photos of Black women with electric guitars, going back to the 1940s. She says, “There is a legacy of Black women and the electric guitar!”

Laina is describing her focus on Black fans of rock, in Toronto and the U.S. She’s interviewed 40-50 fans, icluding an online survey that she did by first using social media to find people. She confesses to chasing a Black woman with a mohawk she saw on the bus, guessing that she might be a potential interviewee! But she also found that socio-political issues came up quite constantly—some interviewees were embarassed or even ashamed by their love for rock, punk, or metal. Mashadi describes using Facebook and Twitter to find people.

Mashadi also talks about how essential archives are. She describes how some Black woman musicians—including young ones—disappear from the scene, the picture, and history, and she wants to push back against absence and amnesia. Yet some Black women don’t want to be interviewed, don’t want to go on the record with their challenges, their sacrifices, and their choices.

This is making me value the oral history component of Women Who Rock even more!

Laina describes some of the dangers that go with the scene—hate speech, physical violence—and the special vulnerabilities that Black women have as participants. She’s talking about how Beyonce, “at the height of her power and influence,” created an all-woman band—an incredibly progressive move—but that very few of the musicians have been willing to be interviewed about their experiences or motivations. Some don’t want to be categorized as Black. Laina said she made a research decision to only interview musicians “who knew they were Black. They were proud of being Black and wanted to talk about it.” Mashadi notes how the powerful sense of connection, rapport, and recognition that she oftem has with interviewees is significant. For many interviewees, being heard and understood was very meaningful.

Laina notes that she’s had to remind herself to think about class in addition to focusing on race and gender. Black mationalist rejections of “all things White” is another kind of blindness.

An Asian American man in the circle (who says he teaches hip hop in his classes) asks about producers, race, and gatekeeping. Laina said lots of Black woman musicians have stories about outrageously racist things agents and producers said to them. She describes how Ike helped construct Tina Turner as a wildly hypersexualized Black woman.

This panel was terrific. I’ve read much of Maureen Mahon’s work on Black rock, but Mashadi’s and Laina’s research, along with Shirley’s documentary Nice and Rough, is opening up a whole new way to understand popular music history!

Hip hop in the academic context panel

Andria Millie (UW student) opens by explaining that this panel is a spin-off from her thesis. The big questions @hip-hop in academia: the importance of documentation vs. ‘using’ artists/songs/the genre as ‘material’ without a commitment to community.There are about 20 people here (and four are wielding video cameras or digital recorders!). I’m already feeling a little weird about the ways that simultaneous blogging is pulling me in & out of direct engagement with whatever’s going on at the moment! [Please forgive in advance my inexact & uneven knowledge of people’s names as I proceed.]

Andria just asked how hip-hop is a tool for critical/cultural work. Olisa (?), a local teacher and musician, talked about she uses hip-hop to teach Shakespeare, overcoming her initial resistance to Shakespeare’s canonic authority. She just described how a student re-pronounced a character’s name with hip-hop/Africentric inflection, and she loved it—they “claimed it, owned it.” A young woman in the circle describes a hip-hop fundraiser at Carnegie Hall where the 1% were entirely familiar with the music—she argued that hip-hop is the Shakespeare on our time. Another woman noted that she worries that people don’t attend to the historicity of hip-hop—the profound changes that have occurred in it since the 1970s—and said she wishes some younger MCs and DJs better understood how dependent their work is on the previous generation’s. A woman, self-identified as “a Latina in my fabulous forties,” says she worries about what her daughter learns from hip-hop when the stories told are misogynistic… but she also remembers hiding her NWA cassette tapes from her parents as a teenager, “as I worked through my own rage.”

The twenty-something Asian American student just said that he loved getting women’s perspectives from Salt-n-Pepa!

Medusa just joined the circle, creating a little ripple of excitement and awe in the room…!

I’m looking around the room, Actually, I already did the thing that most people of color do the first thing we walk into a room: I inventoried. How many (any?) folks of color? Any women? Any Asian Americans? This is a stunningly diverse gathering. There are African Americans, Latin@s, Asian Ams (3!), Whites, and at least one self-identified Native American (Jeanette Bushnell). The ages range from @20 to @60. Women are in the majority. It’s been too long since I’ve been in this kind of a room.

They’re still talking about awareness of hip hop’s history. One young woman just said she thinks this is something valuable that the academy can offer—memory, consciousness. But Olisa immediately warned how easily this can morph into arrogance, and the young woman agreed, offering an example of a professor who ignorantly described a L’il Wayne song as plagiarism, missing the deep meanings attached to sampling, quoting, homage, respect, and intertextuality.

Great panel, with lots of thoughtful engagement!

Positionality, location, subjectivity

I’m already deep into my first workshop (more on that in my next post), but I’m thinking about how to offer something as a novice blogger. My perspective on everything I’m going to experience today comes from a complex of related ways-of-being-in-the-world. I’m a middle-aged, Asian American, multiethnic, straight, nerdy/academic, overly earnest, idealistic-but-eternally-dissatisfied woman. I believe in the power of performance to change the terms. I spend much of my time on a university campus where I’ve come to assume the right to free thinking and free speech but am frequently exhausted by the multitudinous ways that straight White masculinist conventions define my days.

So… I love this unconference gathering already! This is great! Let’s see what happens today!